Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Archive for November, 2009

Normal Carb lunch

Monday, November 30th, 2009

I had lunch with a coworker today.  We went to a BBQ joint.  It was hamburger special day.  He jokes around with me from time to time about my “caveman diet.”  I have made every effort over the last 3 months or so to not bring my diet into a conversation even when a good friend brings it up for conversation’s sake.  I find when others bring it up they’re much more interested when I talk about it.

So, I ordered my burger, and as always it was without the bun and a salad instead of fries.  My friend said something about low-carb.

Above picture is stock photo, but basically is what I ate.

I replied that actually I was eating a “normal carb” lunch… trying not to sound like a jerk.  He asked what I meant by that, and I told him that I’m eating normally, I’m eating how humans ate for millions of years.   The vegetables with the meat have a normal carbohydrate level commensurate with the carb level of a “caveman diet” portion.  I pointed out that low carb in a way would be eating very little fruits and vegetables or no veggies/fruit at all.  Low carb shouldn’t be defined as “not eating bread or corn.”  I’m eating the norm, and he was eating a high carb meal… again, trying not to sound like a jerk.  Well, I know this guy rather well, and he knew I wasn’t trying to offend him.  I was just taking “normal carb” imagery out for a spin.  It needs some refining, some “softer” delivery lines.  I’m looking forward to working on that theme.

Anytime I hear from now on “low-carb” to describe paleo (or any other normal carb persuasion), the “normal carb” gun now will come out of its holster.   And that’s the real issue, how does the “normal carb” explanation get through to a high sugar/carber without coming across as sounding like a jerk if I’m basically saying they’re a sugary high carb abnormal mess!

I think it has to be said with a smile, I think it has to be explained that their image of a normal carb diet as being abnormally low is a function of numbers

-numbers of people eating high-carb currently on this earth

-numbers of ag subsidies on corn, rice, and wheat that steer them that way,

-numbers of incorrect studies back in the 50’s & 60’s that became dogma before insulin was understood

A high carb diet is not a function of what’s best for our bodies.  I dig the show Mad Men.  It’s set in the 60’s.  Everyone on the show smokes, on the plane, on the subway, in the office.  Everywhere and everyone, smoking.  The person that didn’t smoke was “abnormal”, in the sense that they were out of the norm by not smoking.  We know now that smoking is not good for you.  Of course, I believe smokers have the right to smoke, but I’m glad to know that the risks are better known.  There is a growing body of evidence that a high carb diet is bad for you.  Just because most people in the industrialized world eat that way doesn’t mean it’s normal, and it doesn’t mean that people who eat a normal carb diet (paleo diet) are abnormal.

Smokers and high-carbers, everyone may be doing it, it doesn’t mean it’s healthy.  

A low carb diet is a NORMAL CARB DIET

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

Next time someone asks you what kind of “diet” you are on, explain to them how you eat, and explain to them that you are on a NORMAL CARB DIET.  Not the low carb or even “restricted carb” diet, you are on a normal carb diet, a diet that was the norm for millions of years, a diet that our bodies best respond to.  You are eating normally, however bland or unsexy that sounds.

Those that follow the approved food pyramid may be eating a low-fat diet, but from now on, I will call how they eat the “high carb/sugar diet.”  I refuse to demonize fat by somehow (unwillingly) calling their diet “low-fat”.  They are eating a high carb/sugar diet.  My diet may be comparably higher in fat, but the key here is that my diet is a “normal carb diet”, their diet is the evolutionary/biologically “abnormal high carb/sugar diet.”

Don’t get it?  Well, read this one more time:

“The deleterious effects of fat have been measured in the presence of high carbohydrate. A high fat diet in the presence of high carbohydrate is different than a high fat diet in the presence of low carbohydrate.”
Richard Feinman, PhD  

A piggyback on Free The Animal post

Saturday, November 28th, 2009

Richard recently posted something titled: Saturated Fat and Coronary Heart Disease, Part III: Cognitive Dissonance

Very well written.  If I had to choose the best way to refute the eternal argument that we evolutionary living enthusiasts must face I would choose this quote:

“The deleterious effects of fat have been measured in the presence of high carbohydrate. A high fat diet in the presence of high carbohydrate is different than a high fat diet in the presence of low carbohydrate.”
Richard Feinman, PhD

The best way to refute some of the opening quotes from the so-called experts (and for other occasions when the low-fat dogma police spew their unfounded claims) is to say this quote over and over.  Feinman is one of the leading researchers out there producing data that will bring down their house of cards:

Read it again, say it out loud as you read it.  Internalize it.

“The deleterious effects of fat have been measured in the presence of high carbohydrate. A high fat diet in the presence of high carbohydrate is different than a high fat diet in the presence of low carbohydrate.”

If one repeats this above quote as a mantra to the low-fat priests whose research now is based more on blind faith to the incorrect “dietary cholesterol causes high cholesterol and heart disease” hypothesis that was essentially unraveled when insulin was more understood, and it became obvious that high blood glucose level from a high carb diet was the true culprit in heart disease and high bad cholesterol (made worse w/ the combo of high carbs and high fat) … well, it shatters their argument.

1. THE WORST: High fat & hight carb/sugar diet.

Low carbers/paleo diet adherents and the low-fat crowd can agree on this!  High fat and high carb/sugar is very destructive.

2. REALLY BAD, ALMOST THE WORST: low fat & high carb/sugar diet

The low-fat crowd made this above recommendation public policy, and look at the horrors it has produced in our society.  They recommend to eliminate/lower animal fat (and almost automatically lower protein) which causes a higher % of carbs to be in one’s diet (carbs that turn into blood sugar upon consumption whether they’re whole grain or not).

The low carbers/paleo diet adherents believe this diet is pretty bad.

High blood glucose causes the inflammation which our body tries to repair by producing cholesterol.  Same thing happens with high fat and high carb diet mentioned as the WORST, but it’s not the fat in diets #1 and #2 that cause the high bad cholesterol, it’s the carbs/sugar!

3. THE BEST WITHOUT QUESTION: high fat & low carb diet And it’s not “Low” carb diet either! It’s normal, NORMAL carbs!  NORMAL LEVEL OF CARBS are eaten in a “low carb diet.”

The low-fat crowd really doesn’t understand the HUGE DIFFERENCE between what we all agree on (low fat & high carb/sugar diet is BAD, e.g., diet #1) and that their recommendation of a low-fat diet with a high carb/sugar content (diet #2) is not the same thing as a high fat diet with low carb/sugar (diet #3).

OK, now, if that was too meandering to follow, please allow me to ask you to read the below once more.

“The deleterious effects of fat have been measured in the presence of high carbohydrate. A high fat diet in the presence of high carbohydrate is different than a high fat diet in the presence of low carbohydrate.”
Richard Feinman, PhD  

Putting Pork Back on the Fork

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

by Lorette C. Luzajic

Bruce Aidells is a man who loves ham. And salami. And spareribs. “I’m a fan of the rib,” he tells me. “I always like meat that’s still on the bone.”

Indeed, Bruce Aidells’ likes meat so much that he writes about it for Cooking Light, Gourmet and Bon Appetit. He also wrote several cookbooks on the topic, including The Complete Meat Cookbook, The Complete Sausage Cookbook and Bruce Aidells’s Complete Book of Pork: a Guide to Buying, Storing, and Cooking the World’s Favorite Meat.

Pork is not just the world’s favourite meat- it’s mine. But even so, the salami still hides guiltily in my secret vice cupboard, along with the Cheetos and the white merlot. It’s been hard to get over pork’s bad reputation, what with the fat, the maggots, bacterial death and nitrite fear mongering. I’ve only been cooking it at home for a few years, and though my maple pecan roast is killer delish, I thought it was time to discover new inspiration. So I picked up Bruce’s awesome book and donned my apron, plunging headlong into the Jerk-Marinated Ribs.

Bruce’s book affirms what good cooks know- pork’s versatility is astounding. It tastes spectacular with nothing but salt and pepper, yet no meat pairs so perfectly with sweet, fruity salsas. Complex, fiery flavours also make a sensational fit. “It starts with really good pork,” Bruce tells me. “The breed is a critical factor.” The Berkshire is one of the best breeds, he says. (The Boston Globe would agree, having called it “the Kobe Beef of the pork world.”) Bruce also likes the Tamworth and Duroc breeds. “It’s not just the marbling,” he explains. “The flavour of pork is called ‘porkiness.’ A strong pork flavour is important.” It’s true that many supermarket selections have almost no flavour at all. Pigs that have been especially stressed from farm to market will be “dry, tough, really bad stuff.” (This is called PSE meat, or “pale, soft and exudative.”) Other pork is so water logged that you’re paying for water, not meat.

Hunting down decent pork in your region will mean a better tasting roast or chops, but finding a trusted source can also mean meat with fewer or no chemicals and antibiotics and more humane animal treatment. Finding a small farmer who feeds his or her pigs scraps and acorns in addition to grains, soybeans, and corn will mean more nutritious and delicious meat, too.

More families are raising their own pigs, guaranteeing superior, safer pork. Tiffanie Tasane and Carl Burgess of Whitehorse, Yukon, bought a house that already had a pigpen. They decided to try raising a few hogs, teaming up with several neighbours. Though regulations mean they can’t sell butchered meat, they enjoy excellent meat for themselves and barter with others for chickens or other foods.

01-img_3335

“The meat is fantastic, far less fatty than what you buy in the supermarket. And sweet. We feed them a mix of grains for protein and produce as well as any scraps/compost we produce,” Tiffanie says. “We don’t raise them for anything other than the meat, though the compost is an added bonus for my garden! It is amazing how they dig up and unearth all the rocks, etc. I am contemplating moving the pen around every few years and using the cleared and manure rich areas as new garden beds.”

02-img_3346

Tiffanie’s family brines and cures their own bacon, and would like to start rendering lard, eventually. There’s very little wasted- a Slavic family requests some heads and feet, both used in traditional eastern European cookery. But the best part is the new tradition- an annual pig roast garden party enjoyed by friends and family.

It’s bizarre that North Americans are so afraid of pork. We’re fatter and less healthy than just about everyone else (with obvious exceptions such as populations suffering from starvation or malaria). That pork is super healthy may come as a surprise, even to those among us who wear t-shirts proclaiming Real Girls Eat Meat. Raising our own like Tiffanie and her family, or finding tasty, healthy meat from traditional farms is best. But even the humble offerings of the supermarket are filled with more good stuff than bad.

03-img_3350

In addition to the benefits of saturated fat (it’s still hard to get used to saying this type of thing!), there are further benefits in the mineral and vitamin content of pork. Pork is rich in iron, protein, phosphorus, magnesium, zinc, potassium, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, B12, B6, and fat. (One of the biggest, deadliest debacles to come out of the industrial vegetable oil scam sham has been the idea that vegetable oils and unsaturated fats are healthier than the fat we’ve been using since the beginning of time- lard. But that’s another story.) There has been much ballyhoo about “the China study” and the “plant-based” diet of Asia. We hear a great deal about how the paragons of longevity, The Okinawans, live to be centenarians because of their veggie soy diet. This is outright propaganda. You might be surprised to find out that Okinawa is known as The Island of Pork. The Okinawa Prefectural Government says, “It is no exaggeration to say that the present-day Okinawan diet begins and ends with pork.” (www.wonder-okinawa.jp) And you might be surprised to know that the Chinese aren’t vegetarians- they eat masses of pork, their staple meat.

04-p1010044

So, wow, pork helps burn off fat, build bones, deflect fatigue, maintain skin tissue, and protect the heart. But what about a little matter of trichinosis? I’m surely not the only one who cremated a pork roast, waiting for the little food thermometer to hit 170, hoping to kill off deadly bacteria. I was surprised and relieved to find out in Bruce’s book that this fear is much ado about nothing. Yes, he writes, American (not European) pork was often infected with the parasitic worm trichina, but that was 50 years ago. The pigs were often fed garbage, and today that is not the case. The officials today can’t be 100% sure that every single pig is free of trich worms, so they continue to recommend cooking pork at high temperatures just to be sure. Bruce advises not to be hysterical, since there have only been eight cases in the U.S. since 1997. “…Cook the pork to an internal temperature of 137 degrees and hold that temperature for several minutes,” he writes. Most of the delectable recipes in The Complete Book of Pork call for a done-temp of 140 or 145- which will rise 5 or 10 degrees when resting before eating. No more burnt offerings!

It seems the whole maggots hysteria is nothing but an urban legend. Yes, flies will lay eggs on rotten pork; so don’t leave pork chops on the counter for six days and then eat them. Obviously.

05-pig1

Finally, about that salami. Raised German, I have a taste for the stuff and suffered a tremendous longing during my stint as a vegetarian, longing that didn’t go away no matter how many ways I learned to skin a carrot. I dreamed of dancing salamis, not unlike the dancing sugarplums. Sweet and fatty, or dry and peppery, velvety, sharp- all other deli meats pale in comparison. And so I read about Bruce’s salami-making adventures with my mouth watering onto the cookbook. I learned with fascination how salami is cured and fermented. Now, it’s been a while since I knew that pork was back on board, along with all the other meats I’d been depriving my body of. But salami stayed on that verboten list, acceptable only for PMS and other emergencies. After all, we all know that nitrite preservatives are carcinogenic.

Nitrites and nitrates are chemicals that can turn into nitrosamines in the body, another chemical that has long worried scientists and consumer citizens. I asked Bruce if they’re really so bad. Much to my shock, he’s not that worried about them. Sure, we don’t want to overdo anything and eat 12 pounds of salami a day and nothing else, but Bruce says nitrites have been used in meat curing for thousands of years.

Wondering if it’s really possible that I can indulge fearlessly on nitrate heaven, I did some googling and found that there is zero consensus whatsoever that cured meat nitrites are carcinogenic. Nitrites do seem to be implicated to some degree in gastric cancers, but they also appear to protect the stomach from ulcers.

Nitrites may also be- wow- beneficial for the heart. They also have antimicrobial properties, which is why they are added to preserve meats. But they appear to destroy bad microbes in us, too. Finally, the much-maligned nitrite appears more commonly in foods other than lunch meat- and those foods are vegetables! These veggies include green beans, carrots, squash, spinach, celery and beets. Should we automatically assume that veggie sources are healthy and meat sources deadly?

At www.preventcancer.com, they state, “Nitrite containing vegetables also have Vitamin C and D, which serve to inhibit the formation of N-nitroso compounds. Consequently, vegetables are quite safe and healthy, and serve to reduce your cancer risk.” I admire this consumer site’s prevention goals, but unfortunately, vegetable foods DO NOT contain vitamin D. There are no veggie sources of this nutrient. Pork lard, however, is the highest source there is, save for cod liver oil. Though the body uses sunshine to make vitamin D, it must have cholesterol to do it’s work, and cholesterol is not available in beets, squash, celery, or carrots. These veggies are all loaded with vitamin C, however. Does that mean pork sausage AND beets are all nitrite safe? Does that mean as long as I’m lying on the beach, I can eat hot dogs with green bean salad? I’m not sure yet, so I’m going to do a lot more research, and in the meantime, I’m going to enjoy all things in moderation.

One final and amusing note to add to the confusion is an interesting tidbit. Bruce told me that many sausage makers are now using celery as the source of their nitrates.

06-img_1816

Bon appetit!

Stay tuned for a complementary article, this time about the pig and the origin of pork taboos in history and folklore.

Happy early Thanksgiving

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Try to keep it evolutionary and primal tomorrow.  You’re going to be offered mounds of potato, copious cobs of corn, plenty of pernicious  pies, and maybe more than a few spirits.  Suggestion of what to eat, well, what my plan is for tomorrow:

-Salad, and a lot of it.

-Meat, and a lot of it.

-Skipping the corn, the stuffing and the potatoes by loading all of the green (if any) vegetables on my plate.

-When the beer is offered, I plan to stick with a few glasses of wine (just not that much of a beer guy anymore).

-When the desserts are offered, I’m asking for the cranberry sauce and fruit.  I plan on asking for that consideration beforehand.

-If after all of that I’m still either being tempted or impossibly hungry, I’ll ask for some more meat.

Well, there you go.  That’s a lot of food, that’s a lot of really good paleo food.  Just go in to the meal with a game plan.  You’re not depriving yourself, and really, excusing in partaking in all of the traditional high-carb T-day food fare as an occasion to splurge is akin to reframing one’s inability to refrain from smoking behind the middle school because all of the cool kids are pressuring you to do so.  Most importantly, DON’T BE THE FOOD POLICE, don’t tell others what to eat, eat what you want, have fun and communion with your friends and family, and give thanks.  There’s a lot be thankful for.

In honor of tomorrow’s big day, Lorette has a great piece on pork.  Pork?  Well, why not!?  Have a red glass of wine with fish, have pork on Thanksgiving, live free.   

Congrats to Lorette on her latest book

Friday, November 20th, 2009

Lorette, a regular contributer here at The Paleo Garden, has recently just published another book.  Please go to her fantastic website to learn more.

Lorette also wrote a 2-part piece here on the late Michael Jackson regarding looking at his life as A Matter of Life and Myth in The Paleo Garden:

http://www.thepaleogarden.com/2009/08/02/a-matter-of-life-or-myth-why-immortalizing-michael-jackson-is-just-human-nature/

http://www.thepaleogarden.com/2009/08/11/a-matter-of-life-or-myth-why-immortalizing-michael-jackson-is-just-human-nature-part-ii/

Lorette’s latest project is titled “goodbye, Billie Jean: the meaning of Michael Jackson

goodbye, Billie Jean: the meaning of Michael Jackson

goodbye billie jean pic art
goodbye, Billie Jean: the meaning of Michael Jackson

fifty-one writers, curated by Lorette C. Luzajic

Handymaiden Editions, 2009

316 pages

$27.95 (shipping approx. $6 to Canada, $9 to U.S.)

to order, pay with paypal.com- direct funds to thegirlcanwrite@hotmail.com- include your mailing address and note that you want MJ book!

or contact Lorette at thegirlcanwrite@hotmail.com.

book will also be available shortly online at Amazon etc.

Dearest friends, I am thrilled to announce the project that has occupied the last four months of my time. Please join me in celebrating the most fascinating person of all- Michael Jackson. I am honoured to have worked with fifty amazing writers to bring this book to you, a collection of thoughts, opinions, ideas on the meaning of Michael Jackson. These very interesting contributors range from therapist to Pulitzer-prize winning journalist to bestselling author to friend of Michael himself to monk to drag queen, and so many more. In addition, I thank internationally renowned pop artist Iaian Greenson for the custom cover commission. And I thank Toronto’s premier graphic designer, newly branched into fashion- designing shoes- Gonzalo de Cardenas for cover design.

The Writers

Jason Bourner
Russell Bowers
Coline Covington
Kevin Craig
Michael Davidson
Jeff Dayton-Johnson
Antony Di Nardo
Joseph Dispenza
Donnarama
Sherman Fleming
Eddie Ford
Timothy Gabriele
Stephen J. Gertz
Andreas Gripp
Andy Guess
Rohin Guha
Stan Guthrie
Chris Hedges
HiScrivener
Obiwu Iwuanyanwu
Reuben Jackson
Pat Kane
Jamyang Khedrup
Willie James King
Jeff Koopersmith
Kimberly Krautter
Raymond Lawrence
John Lee
Lorette C. Luzajic
Jonathan Margolis
Ralph Martin
David Masciotra
Angela Meyer
Rev. Irene Monroe
Georgianne Nienaber
Jess Nevins
(O)CT(O)PUS
Onome
Dion O’Reilly
Carolyn R. Parsons
Samuel Peralta
Michael Hureaux perez
Javad Rahbar
Dr. Pamela D. Reed
Lauren Reichelt
Ralph Remington
Steven Rybicki
Tara Stevens
Edwin Turner
David R. Usher
Uwineza Mimi Harriet

Thank you to all of these amazing contributors. This anthology would not have been possible without you.

xoxoxoxo Lorette

Congratulations Lorette! 

Wolves Among Dogs: Gestational Diabetes

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

My wife is with child.  As I write this, she’s right at seven months along, and we’re sitting here two weeks after receiving a diagnosis of gestational diabetes.

It’s my opinion that one of the worst, most painful things in this world of ours is to have a loved one be sick.  I don’t care to be sick or in pain myself, but given the choice, I’d rather it be me than my wife or children.  (As regards my friends, hey, it’s a toss-up!)  I experienced, after the diagnosis, a few moments of the kind of sheer terror, the mind-blanking fear, that I mostly haven’t felt since normalizing my lifestyle.

(Normalizing?  Damn straight.  There’s nothing abnormal about the evolutionary fitness approach to life—it’s how we were evolved to live.  That stuff most people we know are doing?  The processed foods, the mainlining of HFCS with every bite and every sip, the fluorescent tans, the high heels, the life lived enclosed in machines and cubicles?  That’s not normal.  None of that’s normal.)

Well, the good news—the almost peculiarly good news—is that I am getting closer and closer to being a wolf among dogs.  That entails, here, two advantages.  First off, like they used to say about Dick Nixon, I’m tanned, rested and ready.  My body, my mind, and my spirit are stronger, calmer, more in tune with how they are supposed to be.  Stressed, malnourished animals react more poorly to fresh challenges than calm and nourished animals do.  (And we’re animals.)  The second part of the good news is that over the last year to eighteen months, I’ve been reading about carbohydrates, sugars, Vitamin D, autoimmune diseases, n=1 experimentation, the importance of healthy saturated fat, insulin uptake, and in general the “civilizational diseases” that go along with the SAD (Standard American Diet).  By fate or happenstance or coincidence (pronounced “koinkidink”) or as a small cog in the unknowably vast plan of God, I have been preparing myself over the last year or so to fight this very fight.

My family has been supportive of my evolutionary fitness lifestyle and appreciative of the results . . . but they haven’t exactly been in the foxhole with me, if you take my meaning.  They’re slowly coming along, but they still haven’t taken the plunge, and my daughters, 9 and 5, are still indulged on Fridays with Doritos.  Natasha remains a native Russian’s fondness for bread, rice and pasta.  (Fortunately, another Russian favorite, buckwheat, has a very low glycemic index.)

During our diabetes consult, the patient education nurse, herself a diabetic, advised measuring blood sugar levels for a week and then determining what kind of insulin levels my wife needed.  Well, since my mantra is, “We’re meant to be strong, vigorous and healthy, unless we’re doing something wrong, and if we stop doing the wrong thing we will be as we are meant to be, strong, vigorous and healthy,” I decided to try and control the diabetes through diet.

Grains?  Not quite gone, but heavily regulated and diminished.  My wife has remarked with some surprise that she doesn’t even really miss bread anymore.  More eggs, more whole fat buttermilk, more leafy greens.  We went in to see the doctor again yesterday.  The doctor looked Natasha (that’s my wife!  yay!) over, checked the record Natasha’s been keeping of her blood sugar levels and ketones, and said we were doing wonderfully and should keep on with what we were doing—with no need for medication.  It was nice to get the doctor’s thumbs-up, but it wasn’t really necessary.  We were doing for ourselves (like wolves) instead of running to our human master (like dogs) for what we needed.  We are all, in the end, responsible for ourselves, and, informed of a problem, my wife and I are solving it.

Natasha (she’s my wife!  yay!) feels the difference.  This pregnancy has been harder than the other two—as the ob/gyn says, “We’re not eighteen any more.”  Mornings have meant wooziness, disorientation, nights have meant mere snatches of sleep.  That’s all been changing.  She’s been sleeping better at night, waking up easier, moving easier on her feet.  I’m not surprised.  It’s like the difference between pigging out on a burger from Burger King or Jack in the Box, and eating a big burger home made of grass fed, hormone free beef, hold the bun.  You end up feeling “agile full”, like you could still move around and do something, without the dreaded HFCS narcolepsy.  That’s where my wife is now.

We saw a problem, and we’re correcting it.  Now she gets it, now she understands.  In the movie The Ghost and the Darkness Michael Douglas’ character, the hunter Remington, said something like “Everyone has a plan until they get hit.  You just got hit.  What’s your plan?”  We got hit.  The diagnosis of gestational diabetes was a blow.  Well, when we got hit, we still had a plan.  We reacted.  We’re beating it.

Can you ever really, in the end, beat life?

Probably not, but in the words of Robert Heinlein, “While we live, let us live!” and as Edgar Rice Burroughs said, through John Carter of Mars, “I yet live!”  We yet live—and we are living.

Check out Uncle Lew’s other columns in his series Wolves Among Dogs, here in The Paleo Garden.  

The Paleo Post has been updated

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

Please find in the left hand column of The Paleo Garden homepage the latest edition of The Paleo Post.  Thanks to health epistemocrat’s Brent for the recent exchange which really helped me put into words the paleo perspective on anabolic and catabolic states (my layman’s understanding of all that I’ve read and experimented with on the subject at least).  A legend in the field of anthropology recently passed away, Mr. Levi-Strauss, read about his interesting views.  Mysterious Persian armies, lost explorers searching for Atlantis, why our testicles hang low and the introduction of Lardo, these are some of the other things going on in this most recent snapshot of the evolutionary living community on The Paleo Post.  

Vocab Lesson: Catabolic state

Friday, November 13th, 2009

I want to mention the great blog that Brent is running over at “healthcare epistemocrat“.    Brent is doing a good job forging his “n=1″ point of view by using his own reasoning, and updating his overview of his continuously shaping approach by incorporating other points of view, as well. In this link, he has a great interview.  I was struck just a bit by his comment about the catabolic state, “Today, I aim for anabolism and catabolism-avoidance.

I assumed that  Brent was referring to chronic catabolism brought on hormonally through bad diet (e.g., Standard American Diet of high carbs and sugar) and chronic cardio (e.g., marathons, jogging).   Because Brent, like many others in our evolutionary community, appreciates the merits of intermittent fasting, he inherently endorses acute catabolism.  So, when he writes  ”catabolism-avoidance” it should not be assumed that you should always be afraid of dipping into the catabolic state.

I don’t mean to speak for him here, but I want to illustrate in this post that catabolism-avoidance means something completely different in the paleo community compared with the layman’s and/or mainstream fitness-health expert’s definition.  The mainstream’s point of view that we should practice  TOTAL catabolism-avoidance (both acute and chronic) is very destructive.  For example, the guy I buy my supplements from at the vitamin store is a body builder who would agree with Brent’s statement, but wouldn’t understand that what Brent is saying is completely different.  This body builder is hopped up on carb drinks, sugar protein shakes, and is eating 6 meals a day.  IF in his routine?  As if!  There’s a difference here in philosophy that needs to be pointed out.

In my studies on the subject, heavily influenced by Dr. De Vany’s take on it, given the non-steady state of the energy landscape from which humanity over millions of years had to had to choose from for fuel, there were dips into the catabolic state.  These were acute catabolic states that happened frequently yet randomly, but not chronically.  In my understanding, that’s what an Intermittent Fast (IF) is all about, recreating the blueprint of a time when we didn’t have such constant access to calories, recreating a hormonal environment based on diet composition and eating frequency for which our endocrinological systems are best adapted .  Certainly, having a meal at 6 or 7pm in the evening, and not eating until breakfast the next morning at 6 or 7am allows for your body to reap some of the benefits of IF.  I’m not going to repeat or reinterpret Professor De Vany’s thoughts on the matter, go to Arthur De Vany’s website for an education of why you don’t need to be afraid of the word “catabolic.”  My purpose in writing the below is just to quickly point out the different view an adherent to evolutionary living has on this word compared with the mainstream.

A non-paleo bodybuilder would have a hard time understanding balancing IF (which is a short term fast that brings on an acute catabolic state) and “catabolism-avoidance”, because for him he can’t see the difference between acute catabolism (via IF) and chronic catabolism (via cardio and bad diet or long-term starvation). The bodybuilder (or runner) as reward for never going into a catabolic state maintains a high insulin level via eating high carbs and 6 meals a day. The piper gets paid in the end when metabolic syndrome inevitably results.

Again, a chronic catabolic state through long term & constant caloric deprivation, which is unfortunately many people’s approach to dieting, can be very harmful in breaking down muscle.  It causes your body to retain fat while you’re hungry because you’re still eating a high % carb diet (causing high insulin) even though you have reduced your caloric intake.  In the end, as you may have experienced, it results in binge eating.  And what is that you binge on?  A plate full of meat and vegetables?  No, after someone starves themselves while still maintaining the standard American diet, they binge on as much bread, pasta, crackers, chips, potatoes, and corn products they can stuff in their faces.

However, the paleo diet allows you to:

-never experience long-term hunger, as you are not counting calories,

-eating until full (an agile fullness),

-and insulin levels spike just a bit after eating fruits and vegetables with moderate levels of carbs

-then low (normal!) insulin levels are restored so that fat stores may be utilized during a brief fast or overnight while sleeping.

Someone who is starving themselves but occasionally eating pieces of bread and potatoes (or candy!) spike their insulin levels very high so even when their cells are screaming in hunger, the insulin (from the high carb shock) doesn’t let them access fat stores.  OK, even with all of that said, when you’re on an Evolutionary Fitness diet, or as it’s called now, New Evolution Diet, even though you cycle energy better by going through glucose and then accessing your free fatty acids, even if you’re not doing IF you still dip into a catabolic state overnight.  Not a bad thing.  Why?  To clean out the waste, the injured parts of cells, the dying cells.  I think it’s worth it to post this large section from Wikipedia below:

Catabolism (Greek kata = downward + ballein = to throw) is the set of metabolic pathways that break down molecules into smaller units and release energy.[1] In catabolism, large molecules such as polysaccharides, lipids, nucleic acids and proteins are broken down into smaller units such as monosaccharides, fatty acids,nucleotides and amino acids, respectively. As molecules such as polysaccharides, proteins and nucleic acids are made from long chains of these small monomer units (mono = one + mer = part), the large molecules are called polymers (poly = many).

Cells use the monomers released from breaking down polymers to either construct new polymer molecules, or degrade the monomers further to simple waste products, releasing energy. Cellular wastes include lactic acid, acetic acid, carbon dioxide, ammonia, and urea. The creation of these wastes is usually an oxidation process involving a release of chemical free energy, some of which is lost as heat, but the rest of which is used to drive the synthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). This molecule acts as a way for the cell to transfer the energy released by catabolism to the energy-requiring reactions that make up anabolism. Catabolism therefore provides the chemical energy necessary for the maintenance and growth of cells. Examples of catabolic processes include glycolysis, the citric acid cycle, the breakdown of muscle protein in order to use amino acids as substrates for gluconeogenesis and breakdown of fat in adipose tissue to fatty acids.

There are many signals that control catabolism. Most of the known signals are hormones and the molecules involved in metabolism itself. Endocrinologists have traditionally classified many of the hormones as anabolic or catabolic, depending on which part of metabolism they stimulate. The “classic” catabolic hormones known since the early 20th century are cortisol, glucagon, and adrenaline (and other catecholamines). In recent decades, many more hormones with at least some catabolic effects have been discovered, including cytokinesorexin and hypocretin (a hormone pair), and melatonin.

So, a smart paleo educated person has a different understanding of catabolism-avoidance than a bodybuilder or the layman in general.

-You avoid chronic catabolism by not doing a chronic & constant caloric deprivation diet.

-You avoid chronic catabolism by not having chronic high levels of insulin from eating less % of carbs in your diet.  Chronic catabolism happens at the cellular level when muscular and organ and brain cells become insulin resistant and are deprived of fuel even when you have plenty of fat stores.   The fat is locked essentially so long as your insulin remains at an average high state.  Insulin resistance happens when you’re constantly exposed to high levels of insulin.

-You avoid chronic catabolism by not engaging in chronic jogging and marathoning.

However, you embrace “intermittent catabolism” (e.g., acute catabolic state) by allowing for your body to go 10-14 hours without eating (overnight or skipping a meal or doing an IF), and not spiking your insulin levels before you start this short fast.

An acute catabolic state may be viewed as a spring cleaning for your cells.  This allows for the good stuff to keep growing, weeds not to develop, and lets the dead flowers return to the earth to help the next cycle bloom.  In a jungle or a forest the process happens without a human centrally planning it.  We used to live in that environment, too, as you recall.

A chronic catabolic state is when you start burning chairs for firewood.  You want to avoid that.  After you burn the chairs and the tables, you don’t have anything left to sit on.  Your muscles atrophying into nothing from long term starvation (or inactivity or jogging) leaves you nothing to stand with.

“A wind with a wolf’s head
Howled about our door,
And we burned up the chairs
And sat upon the floor.”

–EDNA ST. VINCENT MILLAY

A chronic anabolic state (caused by eating 6 meals a day, high insulin levels, waking up in the middle of the night to eat) is like the cells becoming the person who’s a pack rat, and never throws out the garbage.

Ironically, this obsession about always being in an anabolic state on a high carb diet will lead to insulin resistance which leads to chronic catabolism at the cellular level, as explained above, with a lot of garbage piling up throughout your body in your adipose (fat) cells and throughout your body (again, go to De Vany’s site, and buy his book due out this coming 2010 summer).  This garbage has a way of accumulating into mountains and smelling really bad when not thrown out.  The smell in our modern times takes on the form of dozens of diseases that weren’t common or even non-existant in the paleo garden.

Thanks to health epistemocrat (Brent’s site) for recently mentioning The Paleo Garden and bestowing us with a Doctorate of Curiosity.  I hope that this post contributes a note or two to the online melody for which health epistemocrat is certainly also very much providing instrumentation.

A Matter of Life or Myth: The Drunken Monkey (part IV)

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

The Drunken Monkey

why humans love getting high (Part IV)

by Lorette C. Luzajic

For Part III of The Drunken Monkey, please click here

You may already buy drugs on a regular basis- for your cat. Isn’t it so cute the way some cats go nuts for this green leafy thing? Who among us would say, “Felix, I’ve made you an appointment because I’m worried about your catnip use”? Sure, if Felix pants by the special spot you keep his stash and stops eating or cleaning himself, you may have reason for concern. But chances are, you think it’s sweet and quite healthy the way he licks, paws, and clambers for the weed, then frolics about the house before falling into a dreamy slumber. And yes, it is what it appears to be- your cat is getting high, very high, and then coming down. It is less widely known that cats also enjoy getting high- or low, rather- from the relaxing valerian plant, which humans also use in tea as a relaxant.

The big cats have appetites for much stronger intoxicants. The jaguar seeks out and chews on a poisonous vine, then trips out of his mind. Naysayers say we can’t prove the jaguar is hallucinating, and that he chews the vine simply to purge, much as housecats chew grass in order to barf. But the shamanic tribes of the same Amazon jungles just happen to use that same plant to make ahuasca tea, that brew which sends users flying into alternate worlds for days on end. Some Peruvians say they learned to use the plant FROM observing the jaguar, which is a sacred, totem animal.

This is not farfetched. In Ronald Siegel’s Intoxication, he talks about the probability that coca leaf chewing was a habit South Americans first learned from llamas, whose gnarly temperament became cheerful and energized after chewing on the shrub. Then there’s the old legend about the goats in Africa eating coffee beans. This may well be how humans discovered the wonders of coffee.

Among dozens of other stories, Ronald Siegel talks about lab monkeys who will press a lever thousands of times to make it drop some cocaine once in a while. These monkeys will starve themselves and ignore their young to get at crack. Then there are the reindeer up north that fight over the fly agaric mushrooms that grow each year- those pretty red and white ones that are probably responsible for our conception of fairies and elves.

Birds are stoners, too. Science writer Stefan Anitei recounts in “Animals on Drugs” how Australian red-browed finches enjoy smoking. They are delighted by brush fires, parking themselves nearby and inhaling the fumes. They may get scorched or choked up and fall over, but they’ll get back to their post and continue inhaling. It may be hard to believe, but Anitei tells us that birds have built their own bonfire with twigs and lit it with a match- on their own, having learned the skill- just so they can smoke!

Other birds practice myrmecomany- “ant mania”- allowing themselves to be covered in ants, then doing strange little dances. It was long hypothesized that the ants somehow participated in cleaning the feathers and wings of the bird- but now it’s known that their venom, en masse, treats the bird to a little mind trip. Perhaps the most interesting tidbit in Stefan’s report is that chimpanzees enjoy smoking tobacco so much that they blow smoke rings and take great joy in watching them form.

Then there’s the primate known as slow loris, who enjoys a tipple time to time from the bertam palm, where shot glasses metaphorically grow on trees. The fruits are in a perpetual state of fermentation, nearing four percent alcohol. For this reason, it’s the favourite tree of many, especially the Malaysian tree shrew, to whom we are distantly related. The shrew can drink even us Germans under the table, with barely a wobble.

New Scientist magazine reports some interesting party animals:

Morphine is one of the wonders of the world, a true gift of painkilling when you’re having your leg cut off or your heart cut open. But growing them poppies is quite difficult, what with those wallabies gobbling up the crops and all. Yes, marsupials break into the poppy fields to get more heroin, just like the junkies we dismiss as depraved. “We have a problem with wallabies entering poppy fields, getting as high as a kite and going around in circles,” said Australia’s attorney general in The Mercury paper.

Female macaques love booze so much they’ll take it until they stop ovulating.

Recovering methamphetamine addicts may have the least hope of all addicts, as much of the brain damage is permanent. The only thing that can temporarily haul you out of the pit of despair is the speed, which causes more damage. Given access to meth, mice binge on it, too, and their cravings continue long after they have quit, just like in humans.

South American cocaine growers worry less about the law and more about the Eloria noyesi caterpillar. This caterpillar loves the leaves of the coca plant. When researchers investigated why the silkworm doesn’t bother with blow, sure enough, he is resistant to the drug, while the poor eloria noyesi’s dopamine receptors go off like fireworks, making him eager to partake over and over.

The facts go on forever: sheep and horses favour astragalus, a common weed that makes them run in circles and leap and frolic like ravers on ecstasy. Also known as locoweed, ranchers have a real problem because the stuff grows everywhere, and though once or twice won’t hurt you, a long-term habit does a lot of damage.

The legendary marula fruit tree in Africa draws a veritable Noah’s ark lineup of revelers with its rotting fruit. Most scientists dismiss the idea that the elephants get drunk as folklore, because it would take a lot of marula fruit to inebriate a few tonnes. The story began in the ‘70s with a staged “documentary.” Yet elephants DO love getting drunk, though it’s hard work, and have been known to break into liquor supplies and ransack villages for booze.

The Canadian bighorn mountain sheep has problems of its own. It likes rare yellow lichen that grows sparsely in the Rockies. This mountain moss offers no nutritional value, and it grows in dangerous rocks way up in the mountains. But it messes the sheep right up, and they will clamber to incredibly dangerous locales to get at it. And while that’s all fun and games, it’s not that great when the sheep rubs his teeth against the rock, scraping them pretty much off completely, just to get every last bit of moss. So anyone who has experienced the humiliation of scraping the last traces of whatever it was out of their bag, bowl or pipe, or licking the last of the vodka up from a spill on the table, can rest easy. We’re not alone.

What does all of this mean, then, this secret history of the world, including the natural world?

It means we’ve been barking up the wrong marula fruit tree for too long. Clearly, complete abstinence is an aberration of reality- history is soaked in just as much booze as blood. But obviously addiction and physical damage are also realities, problems we haven’t solved by stuffing our prisons full, by demeaning addicts as defective, weak, nihilistic sinners. Facing the truth is our best bet at finding balance, in becoming responsible about our natural instincts

Life is hard. The gods sent us salves to ease the pain, provide pleasure, relieve boredom, create community, and expand our spirituality. Nature is often brutal, but built into us is a desire that can lead us to relief, however temporary, so that we can catch our second wind and tarry on. What might happen if we look truthfully at history, at the economy, at those we consider to be the lower echelon of the social ladder? What would become of crime, of health, of the mental health care industry, of church, of prisons, if we acknowledged reality for a change? What might happen if we develop a reverent relationship with these primal, built-in needs? I’d love to find out.

Check out Lorette’s wildly popular series, “A Matter of Life or Myth”, here on The Paleo Garden.