Here’s my “get out of jail free” card, my post where I go off on a tangent. Perhaps, this isn’t the first time, and after all it’s a blog for goodness sake. I will make a full circle, it may be a bit of a lopsided circle, but I’ll come back around. Here I go.
Awhile back I posted something about “Paleo Medicine.”
One of my underlying points in that piece was if we are so ready to accept that medically trained professionals are giving out bad medical treatment and advice along the lines of low-fat dogma, then perhaps we shouldn’t think that the best paleo/primal/evolutionary advice is exclusively coming from a trained MD.
There are differences of opinion regarding many things in the paleo diet and lifestyle such as intake of dairy, starchy carbs, and whether the % of saturated fat from paleolithic times indeed is significant in a modern paleo diet even though saturated fat has not been shown to be a contributer to heart disease. On the other hand, putting one’s self into a state of hyperlipidity via a can of lard, though perhaps not possible 10k years ago, may be an effective treatment. There are paleo medical & research doctors from various medical fields that are on different sides of the above mentioned issues.
That’s why I really take my hat off to Dr. Stephan Guyenet of Whole Health Source. In the comment section of a post he did last year, Guyanet wrote when someone questioned why Guyenet would bring up the work of Colpo:
“I disagree. Every time I’ve looked up one of Colpo’s references, what he claimed about it has been correct.
If you’ll notice, my favorite nutrition authority is a dentist. Being trained in medicine does not qualify a person to correctly interpret scientific studies or know the first thing about nutrition. I can tell you as a Ph.D. student, M.D.s do not receive the training necessary to critically interpret scientific papers. Many of them can do it well, but it’s because they’re intelligent people who took the time to teach themselves, not because they’re M.D.s. So the fact that Colpo isn’t an M.D. or a nutritionist doesn’t bother me in the slightest.
I never call anyone Dr. so-and-so in the comments section on this blog. Everyone goes by their first name here, and anyone with a good idea gets to voice it on an equal footing. That’s because I’ve discovered that good nutrition-health information often comes from people without credentials.
Colpo is one of the very rare people who actually seems to read the studies he cites in detail.
However, I’m always interested to hear the other side of the story. I’d appreciate it if you could pass along the critique you mentioned. Although I don’t see Yahoo answers by random M.D.s as a very reliable source.”
Quick side note regarding Eades and Colpo (feel free to skip over the below paragraphs to the end if you’re not familiar with what I’m talking about)
Now, I don’t have a dog in the “metabolic advantage discussion” that happened between Eades and Colpo. I think Colpo had a point regarding caloric deficit and the fact that Eades’ initial remarks on the low-carb metabolic advantage subject didn’t clarify that the metabolic advantage for weight loss is indeed in a narrow 100-200 calorie range due to the difference in energy required to metabolize protein vs. carb.
Again, I think Eades’ initial statements on the subject might have implied that the low-carb metabolic advantage for weight loss extended for feeding ad libitum no matter how many calories were consumed. I think Eades went on to clarify that indeed caloric deficit is indeed relevant, and acknowledged that Colpo had a point on the matter that was indeed correct for clarification’s sake. I also agree with Eades’ point that it’s all to do about nothing when you consider that a higher fat & protein diet provides more satiety thus making one feel that you may have eaten more calories than you actually did.
I also think that Eades’ main point that it’s nearly impossible to gain weight on a paleo low-carb diet regardless of how many calories one tries to consume though still stands, though stands taller with the metabolic advantage better defined. Without taking sides here, I think it’s unfortunate that the discussion devolved, but it doesn’t influence how I feel generally about what both men contribute. However, with that said!, I’ll say this. In Eades’ writings he has noted that he respects Colpo’s abilities as a researcher and writer, and noted that there are some points that Colpo makes that are indeed unfortunately not as well received because Colpo doesn’t have a “Dr.” before his name.
Now, that doesn’t mean that Eades agrees with Colpo on everything, but I take off my hat to Eades, who in the course of the metabolic advantage discussion, did give proper due credit to Colpo. Whether Colpo would agree that he received such acknowledgement from Eades might be another matter, and I do not speak for either of them, that’s just how I saw it.
I do respect Guyenet’s, Eades’ or Colpo’s opinions enough to read them in this information overloaded world. I think Guyenet offers a great perspective regarding how to best process information. Be aware of ANY medical caregiver professional who rests his/her entire argument on their sheepskins and not on the science.
Certainly, someone’s experience and education comes into play when I judge what they are saying to me. Aside from what the opinion actually is (!), I partly judge someone’s opinion on their adherence to a point of view that lacks how to falsify the opposing view.

If I thought otherwise, Dean Ornish and I would be bowling partners,

and that Dude Sisson would be entirely unknown to me. And “Good Calories, Bad Calories” would still be on the book shelf at Barnes & Noble and not on my coffee table.
As I recently read, Richard Feynman said that “science is the culture of doubt.” That’s why I enjoy reading people’s views in this paleo community. It’s full of thinkers, and people wanting to relearn how to think for themselves. We may be a small group compared to the millions that are adhering to the Standard American Diet (SAD) coming down with diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, cancer and obesity in droves. If 100 million people have an indoctrinated stance in something (e.g. the SAD)…. well, that stance can still be wrong despite how many people are taking it.
I’m ripping this following quote off of someone, I forget who, “2 wrongs don’t make a right, neither do millions of wrongs.” In a herd of lemmings jumping off of the cliff to their deaths, I’m sure in the back of the pack there’s a certain amount of peer pressure to keep sprinting toward your doom.
But that’s not the case on the paleo sites and among the evolutionary living people whom I know. For the most part, they’re polite about it, but someone eating real food and thinking for themselves won’t hesitate to question whether the direction you’re going or pointing them toward is over a cliff. So, enjoy the debates, which thankfully are mostly amongst polite civilized paleo types. Wouldn’t you rather be in a group like that than in a group of lemmings that show their solidarity to you by screaming beside you as you both fall to your deaths? ![]()










